URGENT UPDATE: The controversial PEP11 oil and gas exploration project has returned to federal court, sparking renewed community and environmental outcry. On September 16, 2023, Asset Energy’s application was heard in Sydney, reopening a heated debate that has polarized residents across the Central Coast, Northern Beaches, and Hunter regions.
This legal battle follows a significant ruling earlier this year when the Federal Court quashed a decision made by former Prime Minister Scott Morrison to terminate the exploration license in 2021. In a surprising turn of events, the court’s ruling came after a settlement that required the government to cover Asset Energy’s legal costs. This development has led to renewed discussions within the Commonwealth-NSW Offshore Petroleum Joint Authority regarding the future of the project.
In January 2025, the Federal Government took a firm stance by rejecting the PEP11 project, citing public interest concerns. The NSW Government has since reinforced this decision, enacting new legislation that bans offshore oil and gas exploration in state waters. Despite these measures aimed at protecting marine environments and local communities, Asset Energy is pushing for the original exploration permit to be extended, reigniting tensions.
BPH Energy, a key financial supporter of the venture, has kept its shareholders updated through recent announcements on the Australian Stock Exchange. However, this latest court case has intensified frustration among environmental groups and coastal advocates who have campaigned against PEP11 for over a decade.
The potential for offshore gas drilling has long divided opinions within the community. Residents, local councils, and activists consistently voice their opposition, citing threats to marine ecosystems, tourism, and community amenity. With both federal and state governments publicly opposing the project, campaigners are hopeful that the court will deliver a decisive resolution.
As the court deliberates, the future of PEP11 remains uncertain. The outcome could set critical precedents regarding parliamentary control over resource extraction and environmental protection. For now, stakeholders wait anxiously for the court’s decision, aware that the fate of this contentious project hangs in the balance.
Stay tuned for updates as we continue to monitor this developing story.
