Andrew Hastie, the Shadow Minister for Home Affairs, has positioned himself as a vocal critic of the Australian government’s energy policies. During an appearance on Sky News Australia, he expressed his strong opposition to the Net Zero target, stating, “I wouldn’t be much use to the Coalition if I’m out the front trying to sell a policy I don’t believe in.” His remarks come amid growing speculation about his potential leadership aspirations within the Liberal Party.
Hastie made headlines on September 19, 2025, when he delivered a passionate address while showcasing a classic red GT 351 Ford Falcon. He lamented the decline of Australia’s manufacturing sector, arguing that the country has lost its ability to produce “physical things of value.” He criticized both the Coalition and the Labor government for allowing the automotive industry to diminish, claiming, “Both the Liberals and Labor have let us down in the past by letting the car industry disappear from our shores.”
His comments resonated with many who share concerns about deindustrialisation and the reliance on imported goods. Hastie urged Australians to reconsider their energy policies, stating, “If you want to unlock our energy potential and make the most of our coal and gas, let’s go.” He emphasized the need for affordable energy to revive manufacturing, suggesting that the country should not abandon its industrial roots for a future dominated by consumerism.
Hastie’s remarks have stirred debate within the Coalition, with some viewing his approach as a refreshing change. His stance on energy reflects a broader concern among certain factions of the party that fear losing touch with traditional voters. As he noted, “I’m in the minority here, and I know that,” highlighting the challenges he faces within his own ranks.
Despite his insistence that he is not seeking leadership, his rhetoric has sparked interest among party members and supporters. The Coalition has been criticized for its lack of clear direction, and Hastie’s call for a return to manufacturing could provide a rallying point for those disillusioned by current policies.
The implications of Hastie’s position are significant, especially in light of the ongoing conversation about Australia’s energy future. He pointed out the contradiction in the government’s policy of exporting fossil fuels while restricting domestic use, saying, “The hypocrisy is breathtaking.” His comments challenge the narrative that Australia must transition away from coal and gas to meet climate goals.
While some observers may question the viability of a return to large-scale manufacturing, Hastie’s focus on energy and its role in revitalizing the economy is a timely reminder of the complexities of the current political landscape. As he stated, “We need cheap energy,” a sentiment that could resonate with voters concerned about rising costs of living.
The political environment in Australia is shifting, with leaders like Hastie advocating for a re-examination of policies that have shaped the economy for decades. With the next federal election looming, the Coalition must navigate these challenging discussions carefully, balancing the desires of traditional supporters with the demands of a changing electorate.
As Andrew Hastie continues to articulate his vision for Australia’s future, the question remains: what direction will the Liberal Party take? The responses from party leadership, particularly from Sussan Ley, who has been associated with the push for Net Zero, will be crucial in shaping the party’s platform moving forward.
In a time of uncertainty, Hastie’s emphasis on energy and manufacturing may offer a glimpse into a potential path for the Coalition, provided they are willing to adapt to the needs and aspirations of the Australian people.
