The UK government has announced a significant overhaul of its asylum seeker policies, drawing inspiration from Denmark’s stringent immigration approach. This reform comes as the Labour government intensifies its immigration measures, particularly targeting illegal crossings of small boats from France. The changes are largely seen as a response to the growing support for the populist Reform UK party, led by Nigel Farage, which has shifted the political landscape regarding immigration.
On Saturday, the Home Office confirmed that the statutory duty to provide support, including housing and weekly allowances for certain asylum seekers, will be revoked. Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, stated that these measures will apply to those asylum seekers who are able to work but choose not to, as well as to individuals who break the law. The government aims to prioritize taxpayer-funded support for those who contribute to the economy and local communities.
The Home Office indicates that these reforms are intended to make the UK less appealing to illegal migrants and facilitate their removal. Mahmood emphasized, “This country has a proud tradition of welcoming those fleeing danger, but our generosity is drawing illegal migrants across the Channel. The pace and scale of migration is placing immense pressure on communities.”
Charities and Public Response
In response to these proposed changes, over 100 British charities have expressed their concerns, urging the government to end what they describe as scapegoating of migrants. In a letter to Mahmood, these organizations argued that the new policies could fuel racism and violence in society. They emphasized that refugees do not choose their asylum destinations based solely on policy but often come to the UK due to familial ties, language familiarity, or existing community connections.
Polling data indicates that immigration has surpassed economic issues as the primary concern among UK voters. Recent figures reveal that 109,343 individuals claimed asylum in the UK in the year ending March 2025, marking a 17 percent increase from the previous year and exceeding the previous peak of 103,081 in 2002.
The Home Office has stated that its reforms will not only take cues from Denmark but will also consider the practices of other European nations, where refugee status is often temporary, support is conditional, and integration is expected. “The UK will now match and in some areas exceed these standards,” the department noted.
Denmark’s Asylum Model
Earlier this year, senior officials from the Home Office visited Copenhagen to study Denmark’s asylum policies. Under these regulations, migrants are granted temporary residence permits, typically lasting two years, and must reapply upon expiration. If the Danish government deems an asylum seeker’s home country safe, individuals may be repatriated. Denmark has also implemented stricter pathways to citizenship and family reunification.
For over a decade, Denmark has been recognized for its tough immigration policies, which the Home Office claims have led to a 40-year low in asylum claims and a 95 percent removal rate of rejected applicants. In contrast, the UK currently grants asylum to those who can substantiate their fear of danger in their home countries, allowing refugee status for five years, after which individuals may apply for permanent settlement.
The growing anti-immigration sentiment in the UK has been evidenced by protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers. The political climate continues to evolve as immigration remains at the forefront of national discourse, with the government under pressure to respond effectively to public concerns while balancing humanitarian commitments.
As the UK embarks on these significant changes to its asylum policies, the implications for individuals seeking refuge in the country and the broader societal impact remain to be seen.
