UPDATE: Tensions are boiling over in Wynnum, Brisbane, as residents vehemently oppose plans for new 15-storey apartment towers that could transform their beloved coastal community. Over 200 residents gathered just last night at the Wynnum Municipal Hall, expressing their outrage at the proposed changes that they believe would strain local infrastructure and disrupt their laid-back lifestyle.
The Brisbane City Council has announced this controversial development as part of its Suburban Renewal Precinct Plan, aiming to rezone areas near Wynnum Central Station. Many locals fear that these towering structures will alter the character of their neighborhood, which retains a small-town vibe amidst traditional Queenslander homes. “This will change everything I love about living here,” one resident declared amidst chants of “shame” directed at Councillor Alex Givney, who faced a brutal backlash during the meeting.
The forum saw impassioned pleas from residents, including Linda Moffat, who has lived in Wynnum for 68 years. She stressed, “We don’t want it here at all. We want to leave our little village the way it is.” The sentiment resonated with many, reflecting the community’s desire to preserve their unique lifestyle.
Brisbane City Council argues that the new developments are essential for boosting local business, providing public transport options, and addressing the ongoing housing crisis. A council promotional leaflet claims the plan will deliver homes, jobs, shops, restaurants, and community facilities. However, the community remains divided, with some acknowledging the need for more housing but rejecting the specifics of this plan.
The council has proposed allowing high-rise buildings along select streets, with mixed-use developments replacing existing structures. Yet, critics argue that existing infrastructure, including schools and healthcare facilities, is already at capacity. Tarnya Lowe, chair of the Wynnum-Manly Community Group, emphasized the need for adequate community consultation and infrastructure investment. “We’re pro-development, but this plan doesn’t provide the necessary infrastructure,” she stated.
Concerns were also raised about potential environmental impacts, traffic congestion, and public safety as the population density increases. With Wynnum’s population around 14,000 according to the 2021 census, residents are worried about how much more the area can accommodate without significant investment in public services.
Despite the backlash, some community members see potential benefits. David, owner of a local restaurant, noted that increased population density could boost the local economy. “For business, more people would definitely be good,” he admitted, while also acknowledging the concerns of fellow residents.
The local Labor Party has criticized the ruling LNP’s development policy, asserting that the council is prioritizing profits over community wellbeing. Jared Cassidy, a leader in the opposition, highlighted discrepancies in the decision-making process, questioning why Wynnum was selected over other areas with better public transport access.
As part of the ongoing discourse, Councillor Givney has encouraged constituents to submit their feedback before the deadline on November 23, 2023. “If you’re not happy with what this plan looks like, tell us what you would be happy with,” she urged, attempting to bridge the gap between community concerns and council plans.
The contentious debate in Wynnum illustrates a broader struggle faced by many suburban communities grappling with rapid urbanization and development pressures. As residents express their concerns and organize protests, the future of Wynnum hangs in the balance.
Stay tuned for more updates as this story develops, and follow local news sources for the latest information on community meetings and council discussions.
