Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declined requests for a federal royal commission into the Bondi Beach terror attack, despite appeals from the families of the victims. He stated that this decision aligns with what he believes is “in the national interest.” Instead, the government will pursue a review led by former Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) chief Dennis Richardson, which is set to be completed by April 2024.
The Richardson Review will focus on the law enforcement response to the attack, examining how effectively federal and state agencies shared information and whether additional measures could have been taken to prevent the incident. The review will be managed by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and will assess the legal frameworks currently in place.
In responding to an open letter from families of the 11 victims, Albanese expressed that a royal commission would not be suitable for this situation. He emphasized that while royal commissions excel at determining facts, they often struggle with issues where consensus is lacking. He indicated that the Richardson Review would be more effective in establishing those facts without potentially reigniting conflicts over differing perspectives.
Families of the victims have expressed their disappointment over the Prime Minister’s decision. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley criticized Albanese, stating his response “insulted those who have endured the unimaginable.” Ley argued that the families, the Jewish community, and prominent figures across Australia have all called for a royal commission. She described Albanese’s decision as patronizing and suggested it indicates a failure to listen to the needs of the victims’ families.
The Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-CEO Alex Ryvchin echoed these sentiments, asserting that a royal commission is “the least that can be done to bring some semblance of justice.” He criticized the government for what he described as a lack of action and responsiveness to expert opinions and community concerns. Ryvchin argued that only a royal commission possesses the authoritative power necessary to uncover the circumstances surrounding the attack and to recommend necessary changes to prevent future tragedies.
Albanese acknowledged the pain experienced by the families of the victims, stating, “My heart breaks for the families of the victims of the Bondi terrorist atrocity.” He reiterated his commitment to acting in the national interest and ensuring that the Richardson Review addresses any gaps in the effectiveness of federal agencies, including the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and ASIO.
The review will evaluate the knowledge federal agencies had regarding the attackers prior to the incident and the effectiveness of intelligence sharing among agencies. Albanese concluded by highlighting the importance of the Richardson Review in addressing national security concerns and ensuring that any recommendations made are implemented effectively.
As the community continues to mourn the tragic loss of life, the decision not to pursue a royal commission has sparked significant debate about the best path forward for accountability and prevention in the face of future threats.
