UPDATE: Western Australia’s Liberal leader Basil Zempilas has yet to commit to his party’s controversial stance on banning puberty blockers and gender-affirming surgeries for transgender youth. This comes as pressure mounts following recent comments from Shadow Health Minister Libby Mettam advocating for immediate changes to healthcare policies affecting young people diagnosed with gender dysphoria.
In an interview with The Australian, Mettam criticized the current model of care in Western Australia, suggesting it could lead to “lifelong harms” for vulnerable youth. She called for a ban on the existing treatment regime, echoing similar policies enacted by the Liberal governments in Queensland and the Northern Territory. Mettam’s remarks follow her previous refusal to meet with parents of transgender youth, drawing criticism from LGBTIQA+ advocacy groups.
During a media inquiry, Zempilas was asked whether he supports the party’s existing policy on restricting access to gender-affirming healthcare. His response lacked definitive support, stating, “Policies for the 2029 election will be developed and announced in due course.” This ambiguity raises questions about the party’s direction under his leadership.
Mettam, now the deputy leader, has taken a hard stance against the current treatment model, which she believes is outdated and insufficiently supportive of minors in need of care. “Children and young people experiencing gender dysphoria are often highly vulnerable,” she emphasized, underscoring the necessity for a thorough review of treatment protocols.
Adding to the controversy, Zempilas’s spokesperson indicated that Mettam’s statements were made “in the context” of the last election policy, but declined to elaborate on whether the proposed ban would apply to other medical conditions treated with puberty blockers.
Despite Zempilas’s history of interaction with the LGBTIQA+ community during his tenure as Lord Mayor of Perth, including the establishment of an advisory group, his current silence on engaging with parents of transgender youth raises eyebrows. Critics are urging for clarity and dialogue on this sensitive issue, emphasizing the need for compassionate and informed policymaking.
As this situation develops, the focus remains on how Zempilas will navigate the pressures from both within his party and the broader community. Will he align with Mettam’s urgent calls for a ban, or will he take a more cautious approach as the party prepares for the upcoming election cycle?
With public interest intensifying, the outcome of this debate could significantly impact the lives of young transgender individuals in Western Australia. As discussions continue, all eyes will be on how the Liberal party shapes its policy in light of mounting scrutiny and the pressing need for inclusivity in healthcare.
Stay tuned for further updates as this story unfolds, and for the latest developments in trans healthcare policies across Australia.
