As U.S. President Donald Trump escalates the trade conflict with China, significant cuts to federal funding for foreign aid and media outlets signal a retreat from America’s traditional role on the global stage. This “America First” approach, championed by the Trump Administration, has drawn sharp criticism for undermining U.S. soft power and international influence. Critics argue that this shift creates a vacuum that China is poised to fill.
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has seen drastic reductions in its programming, with over 80% of its initiatives eliminated early this year. The remaining programs were transferred to the State Department by early July 2023. Similarly, the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) was dismantled, leading to a notable decline in U.S. media presence in key regions. For instance, the withdrawal of the Voice of America (VOA) from countries like Indonesia, the largest economy in Southeast Asia, has allowed Chinese state media to expand its influence.
Official statements from the Trump Administration defend these cuts as necessary to eliminate “wasteful spending of taxpayer dollars.” However, the fallout has been significant, as critics argue that the U.S. is surrendering its position as a global leader, particularly in scientific and research initiatives. The withdrawal from international organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), has further fueled concerns regarding America’s declining influence.
In a statement reflecting the Administration’s stance, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly asserted that “President Trump and Secretary Rubio have made America respected again while ensuring that all actions align with the America First agenda that people voted for.” Yet, a recent survey from the Pew Research Center reveals troubling trends. The research indicates that perceptions of the U.S. have deteriorated in many countries, while views of China have become more favorable, particularly among 24 nations surveyed this spring.
The survey highlighted that a median of 41% of respondents now consider China the world’s leading economy, compared to 39% who favor the U.S., marking a significant shift from previous years when the U.S. held a clear advantage. In countries like Israel and parts of Asia, including Japan and South Korea, the U.S. still enjoys favorable opinions. However, in major trading partners such as Canada and Mexico, sentiments have turned negative, largely attributed to President Trump’s trade policies.
Democratic members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee have condemned the Administration’s strategy, arguing that the withdrawal from global institutions has damaged America’s international image without presenting a viable alternative to counter Chinese narratives. Ranking Member Jeanne Shaheen emphasized that while the U.S. retreats, China is actively building relationships and reshaping the global order to its advantage.
Despite this strategic withdrawal, President Trump has recently softened his rhetoric towards China, reportedly seeking a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping to discuss potential trade agreements. Sources suggest that the Trump Administration is aiming for deals that would encourage China to purchase more American goods, which could alleviate concerns regarding global oil demand and the overall economy.
In a speech in Pittsburgh, President Trump remarked about China, stating, “we will be fighting them in a very friendly fashion.” A successful trade deal could serve as a temporary relief for the global market, but critics remain skeptical about the long-term implications of the Administration’s current foreign policy approach. The evolving dynamics of U.S.-China relations will likely play a crucial role in shaping the future of global influence and economic stability.
