Protesters show their support for Palestinians during a rally in front of the Opera House in Sydney on October 9, 2023. Israel relentlessly pounded the Gaza Strip overnight and into October 9 as fighting with Hamas continued around the Gaza Strip, as the death toll from the war against the Palestinian militants surged above 1,100. (Photo by Izhar KHAN / AFP) (Photo by IZHAR KHAN/AFP via Getty Images)
Recent protests in Australia have sparked a troubling dialogue on the resurgence of antisemitism in the country. On October 9, 2023, the iconic Sydney Opera House was illuminated in blue and white, a gesture of solidarity with Israel following the devastating attacks on October 7. However, this display of support was marred by deeply disturbing chants of “Gas the Jews!” and “F*** the Jews!” that erupted from crowds gathered nearby.
The response to these incidents has been alarming. Instead of a unified condemnation, many individuals and officials have chosen silence or deflection. Critics argue that the Albanese government’s frequent criticism of Israel has created a troubling environment where hate speech masquerades as free speech. This perceived tolerance of antisemitism has emboldened those who propagate hate, leading to protests that, while aimed at seeking justice, have also served as platforms for venomous rhetoric.
The protests have not been limited to the streets of Sydney. Demonstrations have occurred in various locations, from Parliament House to Bondi Beach. Some participants have resorted to using symbols associated with terror, including Nazi swastikas and flags linked to Hamas, which are recognized globally as emblems of hate. The absence of consequences for such displays raises serious concerns about societal values and the safety of vulnerable communities.
Challenging the Silence
Incidents such as the graffiti and firebombing of synagogues, as well as attacks on Jewish businesses and homes, highlight the increasing hostility faced by the Jewish community. While many may believe these acts do not reflect the broader society, the words of Pastor Martin Niemöller resonate with urgency: “First they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out…” These sentiments remind us that ignoring hatred against one group ultimately endangers all.
The protests have prompted painful questions about the rise of Islamist extremism and leftist ideologies that threaten core values of justice, respect, and compassion—principles deeply rooted in both Jewish and Christian traditions. The Jewish concept of tikkun olam, or the responsibility to repair the world, alongside the Christian call to “love thy neighbour,” underscores the importance of protecting the dignity of all individuals. Yet, these shared values are being undermined by increasingly violent rhetoric that contradicts the commitment to peace and reconciliation.
The Need for Collective Action
In this climate, empathy must extend to all human suffering. The ongoing plight of Israeli hostages often receives less attention than the pain endured by Palestinians, which fuels division and mistrust. Both faiths advocate for truth and justice, yet the distortion of facts has led to a culture of selective outrage, pushing those seeking peace to the margins.
The silence of leaders who could challenge hate only serves to perpetuate a culture of fear, where honest dialogue is stifled. Niemöller’s warning about the dangers of inaction remains profoundly relevant: when one group is targeted, the entire community is at risk. Australia’s commitment to a fair society urges its citizens to denounce hate wherever it arises and stand together in solidarity.
As the nation grapples with these issues, it is vital for Australians—whether Jewish, Christian, or from other backgrounds—to unite in defense of shared principles. The cost of silence is far too great. In the face of rising antisemitism, it is essential to wave the Australian flag proudly, representing freedom, decency, and solidarity for all.
Now is the time for collective action to ensure that the values that bind society together are not only acknowledged but actively defended.
