UPDATE: Five former chairs of VicHealth have urgently called on Premier Jacinta Allan, Treasurer Jaclyn Symes, and Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas to reconsider a controversial plan to dismantle the state’s renowned health promotions agency. This shocking proposal, which aims to merge VicHealth into the Department of Health, has been branded a “bone-headed decision” by public health experts and advocates.
The outcry follows a recent review by former bureaucrat Helen Silver, which suggested that abolishing VicHealth could lead to a decrease in investment in preventative health, resulting in a sicker population and escalating hospital costs. According to the federal government, every dollar spent on preventative health saves $14.30 in future health expenses.
In their letter to government officials, former VicHealth chairs including Nicola Roxon and Mark Birrell, warned that this “misguided” decision would severely undermine vital public health initiatives aimed at preventing chronic diseases. They emphasized the potential for increased healthcare costs if preventative measures are neglected.
“The abolition of VicHealth will diminish the effectiveness of important public health work,” the letter states. “A busy Health Department focused on acute care will struggle to prioritize prevention and health promotion.”
Despite the backlash, a government spokesman defended the move, claiming it would reduce duplication between VicHealth and the Department of Health. “VicHealth was established almost 40 years ago, and significant changes have occurred in the public health landscape since that time,” he said.
Opposition Leader Jess Wilson has joined the chorus, demanding assurances that the decision will not lead to fewer preventative health initiatives. The Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, which operates as VicHealth, was established in 1987 and has played a pivotal role in public health campaigns targeting chronic diseases linked to poor diet and inactivity.
Dr. Tim Read, a Greens board member of VicHealth, stressed the importance of the agency’s independence and guaranteed funding, highlighting the threat posed by corporate interests in health. “We spend more on health than anything else, yet only a minimal amount on prevention,” he stated.
The Silver Review’s recommendations, which are set to save the government an estimated $27 million, would see VicHealth’s $45 million budget absorbed into the larger health department budget, which is projected to be $33.6 billion this financial year. Critics fear this could lead to the diversion of funds away from preventative health and prioritize acute care needs, such as hospital budgets and emergency services.
Former chair of the National Advisory Council on Mental Health, John Mendoza, condemned the proposed changes as one of the most detrimental decisions by an Australian government in four decades. “If VicHealth loses its independent status, there’s no guarantee its critical work will continue,” he warned.
Public health experts are urging immediate action, expressing concerns over the future of VicHealth’s funding and programs. “The public health capacity of the Department of Health has already been gutted. Wrapping VicHealth into the department could mean a significant reduction in its effectiveness,” stated Terry Slevin, CEO of the Public Health Association of Australia.
With the government poised to move forward, the future of VicHealth hangs in the balance. Authorities have indicated they will consult widely on the new model. However, the implications of this decision could lead to long-term consequences for public health in Victoria.
As developments unfold, advocates continue to rally support to maintain VicHealth’s independence. The community is urged to stay informed and voice their opinions as this critical issue escalates.
Stay tuned for updates as this story develops.
