The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) is investigating its chief, Paul Brereton, over potential conflicts of interest linked to his ongoing ties with the Australian Defence Force (ADF). This inquiry stems from multiple complaints, including one from a former NACC employee, concerning Brereton’s dual role amid allegations of improper handling of defence-related matters.
The NACC inspector’s annual report, made public today, was submitted to the government last week. This report followed Brereton’s announcement that he would withdraw from all defence-related corruption referrals. His decision came after mounting questions regarding his involvement with the ADF, despite prior assurances that he had distanced himself from military engagements.
In a report by the ABC last month, it was revealed that Brereton received special extensions allowing him to remain in the Army Reserve beyond the standard retirement age. These extensions enabled him to continue advising ministers and government agencies on issues related to the Afghanistan war crimes inquiry. This situation contradicted earlier statements, made by both Brereton and senior figures within the Labor party, asserting that he had severed all formal ties with Defence.
Details of the Investigation
The annual report, submitted on October 30, 2025, marks one year since NACC inspector Gail Furness identified misconduct related to Brereton’s management of the Robodebt inquiry. According to the inspector, four complaints have been lodged concerning Brereton’s ongoing role with the ADF. While two of these complaints have been dismissed, the remaining two are currently under review.
The report highlighted that one of the unresolved complaints originated from a current employee, focusing on the processes employed by the assessment team when handling public referrals, as well as Brereton’s management of a conflict of interest related to a defence matter. The inspector accepted the commissioner’s response regarding the first part of this complaint, noting that Brereton had recused himself from six referrals to the commission related to Defence.
Furthermore, the report indicated that one of the ongoing matters was still being evaluated by the inspector at the conclusion of the reporting period.
Increasing Complaints Against the NACC
Furness noted a significant rise in the number of complaints received by the NACC, with a total of 75 documented during the 2024-2025 financial year, up from 50 the previous year. The themes of these complaints remained consistent, with many alleging that the commission failed to investigate specific referrals. Concerns were also raised about the difficulties in contacting the NACC and delays in responses to referrals.
This year has introduced a new category of complaints specifically targeting Brereton’s engagement with defence agencies. The NACC has not yet provided a comment regarding the ongoing investigation.
As scrutiny continues, the implications of these inquiries may have far-reaching effects on the integrity of the NACC and its leadership. The outcome of the investigation could shape public perception of the commission’s commitment to transparency and accountability in addressing corruption within Australia.
